Re: CSV/TSV results test cases and suggested adaption of JSON results test cases from Gregory Williams on 2011-08-08 (public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from July to September 2011)

From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 18:28:11 -0400
To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Cc: "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <F45858D9-3DF5-47CC-BEBF-024662D13DC2@evilfunhouse.com>

On Aug 7, 2011, at 5:10 PM, Axel Polleres wrote:

> Hi Greg,
> 
> My focus was not on the aspect of datatype canonicalisation, but just on using an 
> explicit datatype... So, I'd be totally fine in changing this to e.g. 
> 
> s/"5"^^xsd:decimal/"5.5"^^xsd:decimal
> 
> would that be ok for you?
> Or shall we keep and mark this test case "as is"?
> Or both?

I believe that would be OK for me. And probably makes this a non-issue for most implementations (even if the underlying challenge of testing with possible c14n still remains).

thanks,
.greg

Received on Monday, 8 August 2011 22:29:12 UTC