Greg and Lee. I have updated the parts having to do with the Graph Store Protocol in http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RV-5 -- Chime Ogbuji Sent with Sparrow On Monday, June 13, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Lee Feigenbaum wrote: > On 6/4/2011 5:56 PM, Gregory Williams wrote: > > I've posted a draft response to RV-6: > > > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RV-6 > > > > This clarifies the current state of the Service Description > > conformance text, which differs from the old text which Rob was > > commenting on, and should hopefully address his concerns about > > including multiple service descriptions in a single RDF document. > > +1 to this response. > > > I've also created a draft response page for RV-5 which includes my > > responses to the service description-specific parts of RV-5, but > > which still needs some responses from Chime regarding the Graph Store > > Protocol. > > > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RV-5 > > Best to wait for Chime to respond to the rest of this before sending it > out, but I'm +1 with the parts that you've responded to so far. > > Lee > > > > > > > thanks, .greg >
Received on Tuesday, 14 June 2011 00:59:37 UTC