- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 09:58:54 -0400
- To: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 6/4/2011 5:56 PM, Gregory Williams wrote: > I've posted a draft response to RV-6: > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RV-6 > > This clarifies the current state of the Service Description > conformance text, which differs from the old text which Rob was > commenting on, and should hopefully address his concerns about > including multiple service descriptions in a single RDF document. +1 to this response. > I've also created a draft response page for RV-5 which includes my > responses to the service description-specific parts of RV-5, but > which still needs some responses from Chime regarding the Graph Store > Protocol. > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RV-5 Best to wait for Chime to respond to the rest of this before sending it out, but I'm +1 with the parts that you've responded to so far. Lee > > > thanks, .greg > > >
Received on Monday, 13 June 2011 13:59:22 UTC