yes, it closes that action.
Carlos
2011/5/17 Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
> Just for documentation, this closes ACTION-376, right?
>
> Can we approve these tests
> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/bindings/
> so today?
>
> Axel
>
> On 13 May 2011, at 12:37, Carlos Buil Aranda wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > everything is fixed now. This discharges me of that action.
> >
> > cheers,
> >
> > Carlos
> >
> > 2011/4/26 Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
> > binding05:
> > has no BINDING clause
> >
> > SELECT ?s ?o1 ?o2
> > {
> > ?s ?p1 ?o1 .
> > ?s ?p2 ?o2 .
> > }
> >
> > so I'd expect ?o1 and ?o2 in both orders in results which is more results
> than in the solutions proposed.
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
>
>
Received on Tuesday, 17 May 2011 13:08:02 UTC