- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 00:13:27 +0100
- To: Paul Gearon <gearon@ieee.org>, Alexandre Passant <Alexandre.Passant@deri.org>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I re-checked outstanding Update comments, as detailed below. Some of the response drafts were lying around a bit too long, so I updated them to the latest status and would encourage replies to this email approving to send the responses out (we really should get those responses out of the way, before the LC comments come in). best, Axel 1) http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:RN-1 I modified the answer about blank nodes in DELETE templates, as we finally went for forbidding them, and modified the answer about LOAD SILENT, which we now allow also I added some few explaining words here and there. 2) http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:ST-1 I did only some minor rewording, but I am good with that response to be sent off. 3) http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:MS-1 I changed mainly: 'We will clarify that in the SPARQL 1.1 Update document, in section 2.2. "SPARQL 1.1 Update operation are non-recursive, which means that the resulting (inserted) triples are not matched at a later stage in the query patterns" ' since that sentence is no longer in the spec. Rather, I changed this to: ' The new section "4 SPARQL Update Formal Model" in the SPARQL 1.1 Update document (see http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/update-1.1/#formalModel for the current Editor's draft) shall clarify this behaviour. ' 4) http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:HK-2 Also added a hint to the new formal model and added a note that we moved the INSERT and DELETE sections into subsections of INSERT/DELETE
Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2011 23:15:49 UTC