- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 14:11:26 +0000
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 20/12/10 18:37, Axel Polleres wrote: > 3) also in relation to starts() and ends(), doesn't "starts" end "ends" sound a bit like > the arguments should be reversed as opposed to "starts-with", "ends-with" > (however, that'd make the definitions differ significantly from fn:starts-with/fn:ends-with which we probably don't want...) > Could we use "startsWith" "endsWith" instead (aware that capitalisation doesn't matter)? > Using "str" in a string function to be clear is also a possibility: > I.e. the following alternatives > > strStarts, strEnds > startsWith, endsWith > > Anyways, I am fine with leaving it as is and I think the WG decision was > names as suggested as the editor input. Just wanted to have asked...Opinions/comments welcome. My preference is strStarts > startsWith > starts Andy
Received on Tuesday, 21 December 2010 14:12:09 UTC