- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 13:21:48 +0000
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 13/12/10 11:55, Steve Harris wrote: > My (incomplete, see below) draft response is at http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:DBeckett-1 > > One thing he raises is: Points 1 and 2 on his list in II seem to relate to the transformation from syntax to algebra (which is work-in-progress). > > “"SPARQL 1.1 Uniform HTTP Protocol for Managing RDF Graphs" > is rather a long title; what does 'Uniform' or 'HTTP' add? SOAP is dead. > suggest "SPARQL 1.1 RDF Graph Management Protocol" > or RDF dataset” > > I'm inclined to agree, but do we want to discuss a rename of the document at this point, or are we happy with it as is? > > another: > > “9 Property Paths > I am unlikely to ever implement any of this, it's a second query > language inside SPARQL. How many systems implemented this before > the SPARQL 1.1 work was started?” > > I don't know the answer to that offhand, did we find that when we were voting for what features to include? I know of: cwm, ARQ, Virtuoso, PSPARQL, SPARQLeR, SPARQ2L, GLEEN e.g. Lee gathered this list: http://esw.w3.org/SPARQL/Extensions/Paths February and July 2008 Andy > > - Steve >
Received on Monday, 13 December 2010 13:22:26 UTC