- From: Gregory Williams <greg@evilfunhouse.com>
- Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 01:10:17 -0500
- To: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:30 PM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
> ENCODES(string)
You use "ENCODES" consistently in this email, but [1] had just "ENCODE". Is this a design decision or an oversight?
> STARTS("abc"@en, "a"@en-UK) -> false *** (could be error)
What about the reverse order: STARTS("abc"@en-UK, "a"@en) -> ?
> If the strings are a mix of simple literals, xsd:strings and LitLang and there are two or more different language tags
> -> xsd:string
>
> CONCAT("abc"@en, "def"@en-UK, "z"^^xsd:string) -> "abcdefz"
Based on your description, that should result in "abcdefz"^^xsd:string, right?
thanks,
.greg
[1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0283.html
Received on Thursday, 2 December 2010 06:11:10 UTC