Re: Draft response: JP-1 (Property Paths)

Looks good, just "has to taken on, " should probably be "has taken on, "
Birte

On 1 December 2010 15:56, Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com> wrote:
> Looks good to me too, but I'll caveat that with the fact that I've not been following the PP discussion.
>
> - Steve
>
> On 2010-12-01, at 14:06, Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>
>> I think this is a good response.
>>
>> thanks,
>> Lee
>>
>> On 12/1/2010 6:52 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:JP-1
>>>
>>> in response to:
>>>
>>> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Oct/0063.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited
> 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK
> +44 20 8439 8203  http://www.garlik.com/
> Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11
> Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
>
>
>



-- 
Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 309
Computing Laboratory
Parks Road
Oxford
OX1 3QD
United Kingdom
+44 (0)1865 283520

Received on Wednesday, 1 December 2010 23:28:00 UTC