- From: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 14:58:31 +0000
- To: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
- Cc: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 30 November 2010 14:51, Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it> wrote: > > On 30 Nov 2010, at 15:45, Birte Glimm wrote: > >> Yes, and going from one regime to a more expressive one should just >> give you more answers I think. > > Any logical, philosophical, formal argument for this? Just that I find it hard to explain or conceive why you should get less answers with a more expressive logical formalism, e.g., you can have the same graph and query giving you less answers under the OWL DS regime than in any other regime with the changed semantics. Birte > --e. > -- Dr. Birte Glimm, Room 309 Computing Laboratory Parks Road Oxford OX1 3QD United Kingdom +44 (0)1865 283520
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2010 14:59:10 UTC