Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime

On 30 Nov 2010, at 15:45, Birte Glimm wrote:

> Yes, and going from one regime to a more expressive one should just
> give you more answers I think.

Any logical, philosophical, formal argument for this?

Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2010 14:51:35 UTC