Re: Proposed change to the OWL-2 Direct Semantics entailment regime from Enrico Franconi on 2010-11-30 (public-rdf-dawg@w3.org from October to December 2010)

From: Enrico Franconi <franconi@inf.unibz.it>
Date: Tue, 30 Nov 2010 15:51:01 +0100
To: Birte Glimm <birte.glimm@comlab.ox.ac.uk>
Cc: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>, SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Message-Id: <A3E08A71-F77E-469E-98A9-AAA78EFF36D0@inf.unibz.it>

On 30 Nov 2010, at 15:45, Birte Glimm wrote:

> Yes, and going from one regime to a more expressive one should just
> give you more answers I think.

Any logical, philosophical, formal argument for this?
--e.

Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2010 14:51:35 UTC