- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 22:27:36 -0500
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
(Will get this on the wiki in due course.) Our agenda will be focused around the function library. I'd like to resolve as much of this as possible. We'll use AndyS's emails - http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0283.html and http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0302.html - as a guide and try to settle on: * the set of functions * xsd:string vs. simple literal arguments to and return values from string functions * concatenating literals with language tags (proposal for this and above at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0303.html . See also http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0308.html) * spec'ing out RAND(X) * do all new functions have keywords? do all new functions have URIs? what URIs? * + for concatenation? Thanks to Andy for summarizing many of these decisions here: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0283.html See also Axel's summary mail: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0252.html Note: We scheduled our protocol working session for Wed. Dec. 8 at 11am US eastern time. (See http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2010OctDec/0285.html ) Lee
Received on Tuesday, 30 November 2010 03:28:12 UTC