- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:28:18 +0000
- To: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>, Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 17 Nov 2010, at 11:15, Steve Harris wrote: > Seems fine, but is it BIND() BIND() or BIND() ()? not sure as I couldn't find it in the grammar yet, Andy? (I have no strong feelings on either) Axel > > It's probably right, just checking the response is correct. > > - Steve > > On 2010-11-17, at 10:42, Axel Polleres wrote: > > > I put up a draft response for > > > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Nov/0005.html > > > > at > > > > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:JG-1 > > > > Let me know whether you're ok with that or whether you think whether we should wait until BIND is specified further in the draft. > > > > Axel > > -- > Steve Harris, CTO, Garlik Limited > 1-3 Halford Road, Richmond, TW10 6AW, UK > +44 20 8439 8203 http://www.garlik.com/ > Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 > Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD > >
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 11:28:48 UTC