- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Wed, 17 Nov 2010 11:17:00 +0000
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I tried to update the comments page as good as possible... http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Comments apart from adding some open comments which we have to assign responsibles for, we have two long threads which I don't really know whether we have to address them and how to, namely 1) the one starting with Richard's mail SPARQL 1.1 Protocol: Format of fault messages Richard Cyganiak http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Sep/0002.html 2) and the one started to my answer to Ross Horne Re: Abstract syntax for updates http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Oct/0036.html both these draw long threads of discussions on the comments mailinglist, involving group members answering. So, it might be good to discuss these in the next meeting briefly, or please feel free to suggest how we can close on these or whether you think action is required. Axel
Received on Wednesday, 17 November 2010 11:17:31 UTC