- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2010 20:02:22 +0000
- To: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 09/11/10 17:42, Axel Polleres wrote: >>> which we may want to reuse, or should we uniformly refer to the >>> >>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql-functions# >>> >>> for all functions (also the xs: ones? >> >> Reuse where possible. > > Remembering that we had this discussion partly before, one argument against reuse and for uniformly using a single > namespace was that this single namespace would indicate exactly the interchangeable functions within the SPARQL1.1 spec > and that these functions then would be usable without a namespace prefix as simple keywords of the language. Must have missed that - I don't recall a proposal to make the names keywords in the language for all mandatory functions from F&O - is the proposal to add new keywords for all required functions, then map to IRIs (sparqlfn:) and owl:sameAs to fn:. Andy PS http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=0AkNZYESXv3IndGwyRkRXZ2hES0RjM0c3MHhLa05vTmc&gid=0
Received on Tuesday, 9 November 2010 20:03:01 UTC