- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:12:12 +0100
- To: Alexandre Passant <alexandre.passant@deri.org>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
The rewording you had is fine. On 19/10/10 16:07, Alexandre Passant wrote: > > On 19 Oct 2010, at 14:54, Andy Seaborne wrote: > >> Looks good to me. >> >> FWIW: >> >> The URI is naming a document which is the results of the CONSTRUCT query, which is sent as a representation over the wire from which the triples are parsed out - I don't think the doc needs changing. CONSTRUCT isn't special in anyway (e.g. DESCRIBE). >> > > Right, nothing special but seems (based on the email), that it requires clarification ... to say that it's not special. > >> So >> >> <documentURI> => <url> or dereferencable URI > > Ok, so > > "The documentURI specifies the URI of a document or the URL of a service such that a store will be able to identify, locate and read the document's content". <Spec mode> it's not the URI of a service - it's the service and query string. The URL really does name a document (the results), it's just a computed one. </Spec mode> GET of a service URL returns the service description which is might be a bit surprising as the result of a CONSTRUCT query. Andy > > Makes sense ? > > Alex. >
Received on Tuesday, 19 October 2010 15:12:55 UTC