- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:56:32 -0300
- To: Alexandre Passant <Alexandre.Passant@deri.org>
- Cc: "Andy Seaborne" <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>, "SPARQL Working Group" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
I just checked the draft response, looks ok to me as well. Axel On 19 Oct 2010, at 12:07, Alexandre Passant wrote: > > On 19 Oct 2010, at 14:54, Andy Seaborne wrote: > > > Looks good to me. > > > > FWIW: > > > > The URI is naming a document which is the results of the CONSTRUCT query, which is sent as a representation over the wire from which the triples are parsed out - I don't think the doc needs changing. CONSTRUCT isn't special in anyway (e.g. DESCRIBE). > > > > Right, nothing special but seems (based on the email), that it requires clarification ... to say that it's not special. > > > So > > > > <documentURI> => <url> or dereferencable URI > > Ok, so > > "The documentURI specifies the URI of a document or the URL of a service such that a store will be able to identify, locate and read the document's content". > > Makes sense ? > > Alex. > > > > > > > Andy > > > > On 19/10/10 14:25, Alexandre Passant wrote: > >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/CommentResponse:DB-1 > >> > >> Alex. > >> > >> -- > >> Dr. Alexandre Passant > >> Digital Enterprise Research Institute > >> National University of Ireland, Galway > >> :me owl:sameAs<http://apassant.net/alex> . > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > > -- > Dr. Alexandre Passant > Digital Enterprise Research Institute > National University of Ireland, Galway > :me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> . > > > > > > > >
Received on Wednesday, 20 October 2010 00:57:10 UTC