Re: Fixing the update test case vocabulary.

On 18 Oct 2010, at 13:01, Passant, Alexandre wrote:

> Hi Axel,
> 
> ## Minor editorial comments
> 
> ** In http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/test-update.n3
> 
> :   rdfs:comment     "Some extraocabulary for update test cases this vocabulary extends qt: to describe update test cases." ;
> 

done.

> => "Some extra vocabulary for SPARQL Update test cases. This vocabulary extends qt: to describe update test cases."
> 
> ** In [1]
> 
> 1) "the graph store is supposed to be empty prior to execution of the update."
> 
> => By empty, you mean with an empty default graph and no named graph, right ? Can it be more explicit.
> 

done.


> 2) "the graphs in the graph store are href="http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-concepts/#section-graph-equality">"
> 
> => Missing "<a" tag

done
> 
> ## On the tests themselves (manifestl.ttl)
> 
> 1) Manifest definition
> 
> rdfs:label "Basic update test cases" ;
> 
> =>  Basic SPARQL Update text-case
> 

done.

> 2) On :insert-data-spo-named1 / :insert-data-spo-named2
> 
> rdfs:comment "This is a simple insert of a single triple to a named graph ..." ;"
> 
> => Could it mention named of the NG <http://example.org/1>
> 

done. it's <http://example.org/g1>, BTW.

Thanks,
Axel

> 3)     mf:result [ ut:result ut:Success ;
> 
> => Should be ut:success (or change to Success in the test-update.n3, which I'd prefer)
> 
> Besides that, the 4 TC looks of for me.
> Haven't check the DELETE ones so far.
> 
> Alex.
> 
> 
> On 18 Oct 2010, at 03:06, Axel Polleres wrote:
> 
> > Dear all,
> >
> > I updated the Test case README document [1] specifying the update test case vocabulary [2]
> >
> > As opposed to reusing the qt:data and qt:graphData properties, which turned out to be problematic,
> > I created new ut:data and ut:graphData properties.
> >
> > Please find some initial basic test cases, mainly meant to illustrate the vocabulary at:
> > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/basic-update/
> >
> > If the group (particularly the update editors) would be ok to go ahead with that, it would be geat if we could approve those initial testcases and go ahead.
> >
> > Axel
> >
> > 1. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/README.html
> > 2. http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/test-update.n3
> > 3.
> > http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/docs/tests/data-sparql11/basic-update/
> >
> >
> 
> --
> Dr. Alexandre Passant
> Digital Enterprise Research Institute
> National University of Ireland, Galway
> :me owl:sameAs <http://apassant.net/alex> .
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 17:34:25 UTC