Re: Fixing the update test case vocabulary.

Hi Axel,

## Minor editorial comments

** In

:   rdfs:comment     "Some extraocabulary for update test cases this vocabulary extends qt: to describe update test cases." ;

=> "Some extra vocabulary for SPARQL Update test cases. This vocabulary extends qt: to describe update test cases."

** In [1]

1) "the graph store is supposed to be empty prior to execution of the update."

=> By empty, you mean with an empty default graph and no named graph, right ? Can it be more explicit.

2) "the graphs in the graph store are href="">"

=> Missing "<a" tag

## On the tests themselves (manifestl.ttl)

1) Manifest definition

rdfs:label "Basic update test cases" ;

=>  Basic SPARQL Update text-case

2) On :insert-data-spo-named1 / :insert-data-spo-named2

rdfs:comment "This is a simple insert of a single triple to a named graph ..." ;"

=> Could it mention named of the NG <>

3)     mf:result [ ut:result ut:Success ; 

=> Should be ut:success (or change to Success in the test-update.n3, which I'd prefer)

Besides that, the 4 TC looks of for me.
Haven't check the DELETE ones so far.


On 18 Oct 2010, at 03:06, Axel Polleres wrote:

> Dear all,
> I updated the Test case README document [1] specifying the update test case vocabulary [2]
> As opposed to reusing the qt:data and qt:graphData properties, which turned out to be problematic,
> I created new ut:data and ut:graphData properties.
> Please find some initial basic test cases, mainly meant to illustrate the vocabulary at:
> If the group (particularly the update editors) would be ok to go ahead with that, it would be geat if we could approve those initial testcases and go ahead.
> Axel
> 1.
> 2.
> 3.

Dr. Alexandre Passant
Digital Enterprise Research Institute
National University of Ireland, Galway
:me owl:sameAs <> .

Received on Monday, 18 October 2010 16:02:02 UTC