Re: Comments GK-1 and 2

On 10/12/2010 11:59 AM, Steve Harris wrote:
> GK-1 is http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Sep/0000.html, but
> GK-2 http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Oct/0001.html
> Says to ignore GK-1.
>
> Do they still require a formal response? Seems a bit excessive.
>
> I suspect that GK-1 should be ignored, and GK-2 should be linked to
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/2010Oct/0000.html

Agreed.

Lee

Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2010 16:11:41 UTC