- From: Andy Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com>
- Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2010 20:17:14 +0100
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
In the process of implementing "SPARQL Update over HTTP" and "SPARQL http-rdf-update" I found I was having to make decisions about the status codes returned. == http-rdf-update http-rdf-update should discuss the status code possibilities. This document defines the naming scheme and the POST action, and describes the correct meaning of the REST verbs as applied to a collection of graphs. It would be helpful to mention the correct HTTP status codes that each operation can return, and in what circumstances. We aren't defining this, it is, like the operations informational but we can suggest the basic set to use and we effectively end up doing that in the tests anyway. Because it is necessary for the tests, it is better to go in the doc for LC so there is no argument that a change is being made by the tests taking one particular view. Others status codes are possible (e.g. 403 Forbidden, and WebDav added some), but the core ones are, I think [1]: HEAD "204 No Content", "404 Not Found" GET "200 OK", 404 PUT 204 or "201 Created" DELETE 204 POST 204, 201 200 is possible for 204 if a message is returned. This also has a small interaction with SPARQL Update. PUT or POST indicate whether the resource already existed before the operation and return 200 or 201 based on that fact. Some graph stores don't track the existence of empty graphs, some do. The same variability will show up in http-rdf-update for PUT status and for a subsequent GET or HEAD. Is PUT of the empty graph to a named graph a DELETE? == SPARQL Update / protocol The status code for success should be 200 or 204 (or "202 Accepted"). 200 is appropriate for a "application/x-www-form-urlencoded" 204 is appropriate for a "application/sparql-update" Andy [1] http://www.w3.org/Protocols/rfc2616/rfc2616-sec9.html
Received on Sunday, 10 October 2010 19:17:51 UTC