- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:18:49 +0100
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/SPARQLX There are two flavor of proposal on the table: The old SPARQLX proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2005JanMar/ 0414.html An RDF based proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg-comments/ 2009Mar/0010.html I personally do not find an RDF/XML syntax to meet my requirements (since RDF/XML doesn't play that well with the XML toolchain), though an RDF based syntax may be desirable for other reasons. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Tuesday, 31 March 2009 11:15:04 UTC