- From: Simon Schenk <sschenk@uni-koblenz.de>
- Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:35:58 +0200
- To: "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Received on Monday, 29 June 2009 09:36:40 UTC
ACTION-32 http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/track/actions/32 To revive the discussion on negation, I would like to point you to the overview of options for implementation at: http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Design:Negation In particular, binary operators vs. FILTER expressions, and set based MINUS in SeRQL vs UNSAID are discussed. Note that MINUS in SeRQL != MINUS in Mulgara (?), which has the same semantics as UNSAID. Cheers, Simon -- Simon Schenk | ISWeb | Uni Koblenz http://isweb.uni-koblenz.de http://www.uni-koblenz.de/~sschenk Five sentences policy: http://five.sentenc.es/
Received on Monday, 29 June 2009 09:36:40 UTC