Re: Review of F&R doc

Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> All,
> I have now fixed 7 of the 8 points we agreed to on the teleconf. I still feel 
> that the links to the implementations are a bit awkward, but I hope I managed 
> to make the best of it.
> The patent policy boilerplate is the one issue missing now.

Please uncomment that, yes:

     <h4 class="no-toc no-num" id="patents">Patents</h4>

     <p><em>This document was produced by a group operating under the
     <a href="">5
     February 2004 W3C Patent Policy</a>. This document is informative
     only.  W3C maintains a <a
     rel="disclosure">public list of any patent disclosures</a> made in
     connection with the deliverables of the group; that page also
     includes instructions for disclosing a patent. An individual who
     has actual knowledge of a patent which the individual believes
     contains <a

     Claim(s)</a> must disclose the information in accordance with <a

     section 6 of the W3C Patent Policy</a>.</em></p>

  Had some discussion with Ivan, and we agreed that it is at least no 
harm to have it in, even if there were no patent-relevant issues 
mentioned in the doc.

Another thing is that you obviously also want to uncomment this one:


   <h4 class="no-toc no-num" id="please">Please Comment By 12 May 2009</h4>


       The <a class="http"
       href="">SPARQL Working
       Group</a> seeks public feedback on this Working Draft.  Please
       send your comments to <a class="mailto"
       shape="rect"></a> (<a
       shape="rect">public archive</a>).  If possible, please offer
       specific changes to the text that would address your concern.

We do want comments obviously! ;-)


> Kind regards 
> Kjetil Kjernsmo

Dr. Axel Polleres
Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, 
email:  url:

Received on Wednesday, 24 June 2009 14:32:35 UTC