W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: Requesting input for the Features and Rational document

From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:52:27 +0100
Message-ID: <4A3627EB.4070403@deri.org>
To: Kjetil Kjernsmo <Kjetil.Kjernsmo@computas.com>
CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote:
> On Thursday 04 June 2009 08:46:29 Lee Feigenbaum wrote:
>>> * ProjectExpression needs a better description and motivation.
>>> We feel that the mention of XSLT is not very relevant, as assigning a
>>> name automatically, like some engines do now, is sufficient for XSLT.
>>> It should also be motivated by showing why it is required by other
>>> features.
>> I took a stab at this at
>> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:ProjectExpressions
> As discussed on the teleconf yesterday, it needs better examples too. It 
> doesn't sound like the examples are actually executeable as it is now, and 
> they should be. Also, it is also a good thing if they do not rely on other 
> features that we do not yet have, such as concat().
> It is good to have both SELECT and CONSTRUCT examples. 
> Can anyone have a stab at this? 

If nobody else volunteers (the hope lives :-) ), I will provide 
something by tomorrow.


> Kind regards 
> Kjetil Kjernsmo

Dr. Axel Polleres
Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, 
email: axel.polleres@deri.org  url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Monday, 15 June 2009 10:53:05 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:55 UTC