- From: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>
- Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2009 11:52:27 +0100
- To: Kjetil Kjernsmo <Kjetil.Kjernsmo@computas.com>
- CC: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Kjetil Kjernsmo wrote: > On Thursday 04 June 2009 08:46:29 Lee Feigenbaum wrote: >>> * ProjectExpression needs a better description and motivation. >>> We feel that the mention of XSLT is not very relevant, as assigning a >>> name automatically, like some engines do now, is sufficient for XSLT. >>> It should also be motivated by showing why it is required by other >>> features. >> I took a stab at this at >> http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:ProjectExpressions > > As discussed on the teleconf yesterday, it needs better examples too. It > doesn't sound like the examples are actually executeable as it is now, and > they should be. Also, it is also a good thing if they do not rely on other > features that we do not yet have, such as concat(). > > It is good to have both SELECT and CONSTRUCT examples. > > Can anyone have a stab at this? If nobody else volunteers (the hope lives :-) ), I will provide something by tomorrow. Axel > Kind regards > > Kjetil Kjernsmo -- Dr. Axel Polleres Digital Enterprise Research Institute, National University of Ireland, Galway email: axel.polleres@deri.org url: http://www.polleres.net/
Received on Monday, 15 June 2009 10:53:05 UTC