Reflections on Update

On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 1:24 PM, Seaborne, Andy <> wrote:

> It comes from
> which the charter mentions.

I don't think that matters, since the first bullet point I quoted
seems to be scoping the update issue -- or that's a reasonable way to
read it -- and the charter also mentions, for example, ESW Wiki, and I
doubt anyone believes that that mention puts everything discussed on
ESW Wiki into scope for this WG.

> (and for clarity: I'm not proposing changing the decision of the WG on the overall feature set we decided at the F2F).

I didn't take you to be proposing any changes. I thought you were
trying to clarify the decision by distinguishing subparts. Which I
agreed with and offered a suggestion as to how the spirit -- again, as
I understood it -- of required & time-permitting features could be


Received on Friday, 8 May 2009 17:58:02 UTC