- From: Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 17:24:59 +0000
- To: Kendall Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
- CC: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: Kendall Clark [mailto:kendall@clarkparsia.com] > Sent: 8 May 2009 18:08 > To: Seaborne, Andy > Cc: SPARQL Working Group > Subject: Re: Reflections on Update > > On Fri, May 8, 2009 at 12:58 PM, Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com> > wrote: > > > A possible core: > > > > CLEAR > > INSERT DATA { triples } > > DELETE DATA { triples } > > MODIFY DELETE { template } INSERT {template } WHERE { pattern } > > > > > > And later: > > Graph management > > Graph store > > Multi graph operations > > I like this idea and I really like this division; my suggestion would > be, for the sake of compromise, to put the "And later" bits out of > scope for this round of SPARQL standardization, in order to get to > more stuff like time-permitting bits. > > I think this is in-keeping with the Charter, which says "Insert, > update, and delete: building on SPARQL to modify RDF data stores, > including using HTTP Post" -- I certainly didn't think graph > management, store, multi-graph ops were included in that when my org > voted on the Charter. FWIW. It comes from http://www.w3.org/Submission/2008/SUBM-SPARQL-Update-20080715/ which the charter mentions. Andy (and for clarity: I'm not proposing changing the decision of the WG on the overall feature set we decided at the F2F). > > Cheers, > Kendall
Received on Friday, 8 May 2009 17:26:28 UTC