- From: Steve Harris <steve.harris@garlik.com>
- Date: Fri, 8 May 2009 10:49:04 +0100
- To: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Cc: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 7 May 2009, at 10:39, Bijan Parsia wrote: > So, two other things. > > One, I keep including "simple entailment" in my list of possibles, > but that's already what we have (with conditions to ensure no extra > entailment driven bnodey answers). > > Two, it would be helpful to have a way to indicate whether the > answers are complete wrt to the query and the kb under the requested > semantics. An attribute in the result set would do the job. > > More sophisticatedly, a way to indicate timeouts that would be > helpful. Agreed, that's something we do with longrunning or resource intensive SPARQL queries too. The way we indicate it requires something like http://www.w3.org/2009/sparql/wiki/Feature:ExecCommentsAndWarnings though. - Steve -- Steve Harris Garlik Limited, 2 Sheen Road, Richmond, TW9 1AE, UK +44(0)20 8973 2465 http://www.garlik.com/ Registered in England and Wales 535 7233 VAT # 849 0517 11 Registered office: Thames House, Portsmouth Road, Esher, Surrey, KT10 9AD
Received on Friday, 8 May 2009 10:02:58 UTC