W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: "OWL" Entailment

From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 10:39:06 +0100
Message-Id: <7FA17583-0ED1-4F12-9C5E-75894F82C68E@cs.man.ac.uk>
To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
So, two other things.

One, I keep including "simple entailment" in my list of possibles,  
but that's already what we have (with conditions to ensure no extra  
entailment driven bnodey answers).

Two, it would be helpful to have a way to indicate whether the  
answers are complete wrt to the query and the kb under the requested  
semantics. An attribute in the result set would do the job.

More sophisticatedly, a way to indicate timeouts that would be helpful.

Received on Thursday, 7 May 2009 09:35:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:54 UTC