W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2009

Re: The smaller bites (was Re: Lee's feature proposal)

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@clarkparsia.com>
Date: Mon, 4 May 2009 14:50:32 -0400
Message-ID: <1fc9c2ff0905041150ge864dfbt82bb297a95627fe8@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
Cc: Kjetil Kjernsmo <Kjetil.Kjernsmo@computas.com>, "public-rdf-dawg@w3.org" <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Seaborne, Andy <andy.seaborne@hp.com> wrote:
> So my question - for every feature to add to the WG schedule, what would you remove or deprioritize?

This is -- just to explain a bit, since a few people asked -- why I
marked WBS survey items either with a priority integer or as "don't
want"... In some sense, I'd like to have every feature in the
language, plus more. But we don't live in such a world. :>

Since we inevitably will either get into this state (where every
feature chosen requires something to not get done) or we'll run out of
time or we'll re-charter to give ourselves more time. In that sense my
WBS approach was the root of all evil: a premature optimization. :>

Received on Monday, 4 May 2009 18:51:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:54 UTC