- From: Simon Schenk <sschenk@uni-koblenz.de>
- Date: Thu, 30 Apr 2009 12:48:19 +0200
- To: SPARQL Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I have a question regarding subselects, as the feature has been discussed, before I joined the WG. If we do not add any features such as aggregates, scalar expressions, assignment or similar - do subselects add anything to the expressiveness of the language? All examples in the wiki include at least one such additional feature. Typical uses such as FORALL or EXISTS should be possible in the current version of SPARQL using a combination of OPTIONAL, BOUND filters and perhaps DISTINCT, I think. I would like to understand better the implications of adding subselects and in particular dependencies with other features. Best regards, Simon -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkn5gecACgkQQ0Lz1fXAQeMWAwCfXH5XxLBeP1Q/UwM2pIY+z4gv 4/UAnjywNXTTq7PuCnl5kiSmsoB1iyzJ =twi5 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Thursday, 30 April 2009 10:49:16 UTC