- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.manchester.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:59:15 +0100
- To: "Seaborne, Andy" <andy.seaborne@hp.com>
- Cc: Axel Polleres <axel.polleres@deri.org>, 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On 14 Apr 2009, at 14:34, Seaborne, Andy wrote: [snip] > -1 : Too early. Do the important, well understood, well explored > features first. SPARQL already has an extension point on BGP > matching. Use this and other extension mechanisms to explore this > area. Much already possible, maybe inconveniently and not ideally, > with named graphs and different endpoint setups over the same base > data. [snip] Thinking about this, wouldn't pragmas do the job admirably? I.e., for suggesting/requiring a particular entailment regime? Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Wednesday, 15 April 2009 10:59:51 UTC