- From: Bijan Parsia <bparsia@cs.man.ac.uk>
- Date: Fri, 3 Apr 2009 16:56:40 +0100
- To: W3C OWL Working Group <public-owl-wg@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
While composing a response message on the CURIE spec, I found: http://www.w3.org/TR/curie/#s_syntax "Host languages MAY define additional constraints on these syntax rules when CURIES are used in the context of those host languages. Host languages MUST NOT relax the constraints defined this specification." Which wasn't obvious to me when I was reading the spec before. I guess because it's buried deep deep in a paragraph of seemingly random tidbits about the syntax. So, technically, one could claim to conform to the spec using current SPARQL productions... ...which means that conforming to the spec is essentially meaningless and we shouldn't reference that spec. Cheers, Bijan.
Received on Friday, 3 April 2009 16:02:09 UTC