- From: Lee Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net>
- Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 21:32:32 -0400
- To: 'RDF Data Access Working Group' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
We've got one important issue to do surrounding the bugs that Andy has identified in the SPARQL algebra. The rest of the time we'll be working towards PR. Reminder: we'll also have a voluntary call on Wednesday to continue working towards PR. Lee 0. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, 2 October 2007 at 14:30:00 UTC + LeeF chairing + teleconference bridge: tel:+1.617.761.6200 tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152 code:7333 + on irc at: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg + Scribe: @@ + Regrets: Chimezie + roll call + minutes from last two weeks [2], [3] + NOTE! Two meetings this week. Second meeting Wednesday, 3 October @ 14:30:00 UTC + Meeting after that is 9 Oct 2007 @@ recruit scribe, regrets? + agenda comments? 1. Review ACTION Items These actions appear DONE: ACTION: LeeF to check and annotate open-eq-07 and -10 with mf:LangTagAwareness ACTION: LeeF: open and postpone an issue on unescapes XML in result set format. Let's check on the status of the following actions: ACTION: LeeF to investigate PR mechanics, put together draft transition request ACTION: ericP to poke IETF folks about registering SPARQL media types (esp. application/sparql-query) 2. Algebra bugs (and fixes) in rq25 See AndyS's summary and detailed messages: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0179.html We need to decide how to fix these bugs as a group. 3. Disposition of Comments We need to ensure that we've responded to comments received since publishing the CR version of each of our specs. This is most challenging for the protocol spec. since it's been in CR longest, while the other specs have returned to Last Calls which have acted as synch. points for comments. 4. Query language implementation report @@ EricP, can you run the latest before the teleconference? (Ping me on IRC and we'll make sure we have all the latest implementation reports.) 5. Protocol implementation report @@ dependent on my action to find a good format for the report, and also dependent on EliasT testing the HTTP endpoints we've received 6. XML results format implementation report @@ depdendent on the depdendencies in agendum 5. 7. Testimonials As part of the process of publishing the SPARQL specifications as Recommendations, we should begin gathering testimonials. See http://www.w3.org/2004/01/sws-testimonial for some examples. Let's discuss gathering these testimonials and also see who in the Working Group wishes to provide one... [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/att-0175/25-dawg-minutes.html [3] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/att-0156/18-dawg-minutes.html
Received on Monday, 1 October 2007 01:32:47 UTC