DAWG Agenda - Tues 2 Oct 2007 @ 14:30 UTC

We've got one important issue to do surrounding the bugs that Andy has 
identified in the SPARQL algebra.

The rest of the time we'll be working towards PR.

Reminder: we'll also have a voluntary call on Wednesday to continue 
working towards PR.

Lee

0. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, 2 October 2007
at 14:30:00 UTC
          + LeeF chairing
          + teleconference bridge: tel:+1.617.761.6200 
tel:+33.4.89.06.34.99 tel:+44.117.370.6152 code:7333
          + on irc at: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
          + Scribe: @@
          + Regrets: Chimezie
          + roll call
          + minutes from last two weeks [2], [3]
          + NOTE! Two meetings this week. Second meeting Wednesday, 3 
October @ 14:30:00 UTC
          + Meeting after that is 9 Oct 2007 @@ recruit scribe, regrets?
          + agenda comments?


1. Review ACTION Items

These actions appear DONE:

ACTION: LeeF to check and annotate open-eq-07 and -10 with 
mf:LangTagAwareness
ACTION: LeeF: open and postpone an issue on unescapes XML in result set 
format.

Let's check on the status of the following actions:

ACTION: LeeF to investigate PR mechanics, put together draft transition 
request
ACTION: ericP to poke IETF folks about registering SPARQL media types 
(esp. application/sparql-query)


2. Algebra bugs (and fixes) in rq25

See AndyS's summary and detailed messages:

http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/0179.html

We need to decide how to fix these bugs as a group.


3. Disposition of Comments

We need to ensure that we've responded to comments received since 
publishing the CR version of each of our specs. This is most challenging 
for the protocol spec. since it's been in CR longest, while the other 
specs have returned to Last Calls which have acted as synch. points for 
comments.


4. Query language implementation report

@@ EricP, can you run the latest before the teleconference? (Ping me on 
IRC and we'll make sure we have all the latest implementation reports.)


5. Protocol implementation report

@@ dependent on my action to find a good format for the report, and also 
dependent on EliasT testing the HTTP endpoints we've received


6. XML results format implementation report

@@ depdendent on the depdendencies in agendum 5.


7. Testimonials

As part of the process of publishing the SPARQL specifications as 
Recommendations, we should begin gathering testimonials. See

http://www.w3.org/2004/01/sws-testimonial

for some examples. Let's discuss gathering these testimonials and also 
see who in the Working Group wishes to provide one...


[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
[2] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/att-0175/25-dawg-minutes.html
[3] 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2007JulSep/att-0156/18-dawg-minutes.html

Received on Monday, 1 October 2007 01:32:47 UTC