DAWG Agenda - 11 Sep 2007 @ 14:30 UTC

0. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, 11 September 2007
at 14:30:00 UTC
          + LeeF chairing
          + teleconference bridge: tel:+1.617.761.6200 
tel:+ tel:+44.117.370.6152 code:7333
          + on irc at: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
          + Scribe: @@
          + Regrets:
          + roll call
          + minutes from last week [2]
          + next meeting 18 Sep. @@ recruit scribe, regrets?
          + agenda comments?

1. Review ACTION Items

These actions appear DONE:

ACTION: LeeF to note mf:requires of extension points when emailing out 
update to test suite
ACTION: LeeF to update approval information on all tests approved and 
re-approved today

Let's check on the status of the following actions:

-- misc --

ACTION: ericP to poke IETF folks about registering SPARQL media types 
(esp. application/sparql-query)
ACTION: ericP to write explanatory text saying that, like xsd:inteter 
and xsd:dateTime, the relative order of simple literals and xsd:strings 
is not defined here
ACTION: ericP to answer "EBV of invalid numeric literals" email from Arjohn

-- implementation report --

ACTION: ericP to have first cut of shiny implementation report by 11 Sep
ACTION: Orri and Ivan to publish URL to test service along with a list 
of tests that aren't handled correctly yet

-- tests --

ACTION: Eric+Andy to identify and collect mf:requires URIs and put in 
ACTION: ericP, AndyS to add the mf:requires labels to the manifest 
namespace document

-- spec --

ACTION: ericP to incorporate text to fix EBV of illformed numeric 
literals bug in spec
ACTION: ericP to try to produce a diff from CR to current editor's draft

2. SPARQL Query Results XML Format

It seems we've resolved the issue with the WSDL? Publish as CR ASAP?

3. Test suite

Two issues:

3a) Ambiguity in lexical forms in Turtle data. See


...and responses.

3b) Malcolm Crowe suggests that open-eq-12 is incorrect. Can anyone take 
a look at it and agree or refute?


4. Implementation Report

@@ Hopeful that we'll have something to look at here and discuss

5. SPARQL Protocol

I've received a smattering of responses to our solicitation for protocol 
implementations. I've received no notice of SOAP implementations. I'll 
work with Elias to see if we can test the HTTP implementations; what 
should we do for SOAP?

[1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/

Received on Monday, 10 September 2007 05:30:23 UTC