- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 11:16:56 -0600
- To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Cc: dawg mailing list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 11:21 -0500, Kendall Clark wrote: > Dan, > > You seemed clear during Tues telcon that if I changed the > inputSerialization of the POST binding at all, I should add the */* > type specifier to application/x-www-form-urlencoded instead of what I > would have expected to add, namely, application/xml. I meant to say */* for _output_ serialization; i.e. to say that text/n3 is OK. > I expected to add application/xml because the only other way to spell > SPARQL queries, formally or informally, is through XML serialization > of the abstract syntax. That's the only other way anyone's talked > about, as I recall. Fair enough. > > I'm confused about the use of */* here, and as a result, I'm not > going to add anything till I'm less confused. :> > > Cheers, > Kendall -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ D3C2 887B 0F92 6005 C541 0875 0F91 96DE 6E52 C29E
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2006 17:17:03 UTC