- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2006 14:49:36 -0400
- To: dawg mailing list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
Folks, An attenuated agenda for tomorrow since today's a US holiday: 1. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of Tuesday, May 30, 2006 at 13:30:00 UTC ([2]local times) + Comments on the agenda? + teleconference bridge: [3]tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333 + scribe: EricP o supplementary IRC chat: [4]irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg + roll call + PROPOSED: to approve [6]RDF Data Access Working Group weekly telecon -- 9 May 2006 as a true record 2. XTech & WWW SPARQL/DAWG show reports 3. JSON results format -- update on where we stand 4. valueTesting -- update on where we stand 5. test suite maintenance -- update on where we stand 6. Renewed interest in SADDLE? Cf. <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/ Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0089.html> and followup thread 7. Device Description Repository Use Case? Cf. <http://lists.w3.org/ Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0066>: It would be therefore nice if, in future, such database would be or at least could be implemented using a current or future version of SPARQL. We were wondering whether it would it be possible for the group to have a look at this document to see if the DDR could be a possible use case for current or future version of SPARQL? [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ [2] http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html? month=5&day=30&year=2006&hour=9&min=30&sec=0&p1=43 [3] tel:+1.617.761.6200 [4] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg [5] http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-dawg-irc [6] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/ 0083.html Cheers, Kendall
Received on Monday, 29 May 2006 18:50:01 UTC