Re: agenda, 9 May 2006 telcon

Kendall Clark wrote:
> 
> Folks,
> 
> Please forgive the lateness of this agenda, but I'm new at this and 
> there's a learning curve.
> 
> 1. Convene [1]RDF Data Access WG meeting of 2006-05-09T14:30Z
>    ([2]local times)
>       + Comments on the agenda? (please excuse the lateness: new chair!)
>       + teleconference bridge: [3]tel:+1.617.761.6200 code:7333
>       + scribe: to be recruited
>            o supplementary IRC chat: [4]irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
>              ([5]log to appear)
>       + roll call
>       + PROPOSED: to approve [6]RDF Data Access Working Group
>             weekly telecon -- 18 Apr 2006 as a true record
> 2. Future meetings PROPOSED: to meet again @@when; recruit scribe;
>    -- discuss future meeting times
> 3. JSON results format
>       + ACTION: EricP to publish
>         http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/json-sparql/
> 4. punctuationSyntax: bnodes in predicate
>       + ACTION: DanC find decision record for bnodes in predicate
> 5. valueTesting
>       + ACTION: EricPto figure out what our spec says re: casting
>         illegal lexical forms
> 6. test suite maintenance
>       + ACTION: DanC to follow up re optional test based on
>         op:dateTime triple
>       + ACTION: EricP and Jeen to fix OPTIONAL coding
>    See also [7]comment threads marked [test-todo] and [8]REQUEST
>    FOR TESTCASE in WG threads

[6] records under valueTesting:

    [NEW] ACTION: Andy to draft of open-world = tests [recorded in
    [37]http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-dawg-minutes.html#action06]
    [NEW] ACTION: AndyS to contribute a couple tests for
    computed-properties/virtual-prop/builtin. one usingn lists, and one
    not using lists [recorded in
    [38]http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-dawg-minutes.html#action09]

although I haven't done them - sorry.


> 7. MIME type registrations
>       + ACTION: EricP to respond to [9]Dirk on MIME type stuff
>       + ACTION EricP: to follow up on mime type requests ([10]2Mar)
> 8. UC&R end-game.
>    We didn't do a last call review, so it's not in order to request
>    CR for it. Let's make it a NOTE, shall we? Or should we take it
>    to last call during CR?
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
> [2] 
> http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?month=04&day=18&year=2006&hour=14&min=30&sec=0&p1=0 
> 
> [3] tel:+1.617.761.6200
> [4] irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
> [5] http://www.w3.org/2006/04/18-dawg-irc
> [6] 
> http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0052.html
> [7] 
> http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?type-index=public-rdf-dawg-comments&index-type=t&keywords=test-todo&search=Search 
> 
> [8] 
> http://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/search?keywords=request+for+testcase&hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=&index-grp=Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-index=public-rdf-dawg 
> 
> [9] http://www.w3.org/mid/20060309013957.F70758@skutsje.san.webweaving.org
> [10] http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf6#pubIssues
> 
> Cheers,
> Kendall
> 
> 
> 
>

Received on Monday, 8 May 2006 21:36:37 UTC