more on bnodes in predicate positions

(In response to Andy's message at: 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2006AprJun/0027 )

In addition to the referenced syntax tests being incorrect, this text in 
the draft should also be amended or struck:

"""
This definition also allows blank nodes in the predicate position.
"""

( http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/#defn_TriplePattern )

I'd suggest either removing it or changing it to

"""
Note that this definition does not allow blank nodes in the predicate 
position.
"""


Lee

Received on Friday, 28 April 2006 17:02:56 UTC