- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 07:35:22 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <20050602113522.GK1967@w3.org>
This is kind of like a test case for fromUnionQuery, hence the threading choice. Using Named Graphs (rq23) parlance, if I have a dataset: default: { } <lies.rdf>: { <TheMoon> <isMadeOf> <GreenCheese> } <truth.rdf>: { <TheMoon> <isMadeOf> <Rocks>, <Dirt> } and a query: SELECT ?stuff FROM <truth.rdf> FROM NAMED <lies.rdf> WHERE { <TheMoon> <isMadeOf> ?stuff } I get pretty predictable results: | Rocks | | Dirt | But the default graph need not start out empty. If i happen on a default graph that alreay has <lies.rdf> in it: default: { <TheMoon> <isMadeOf> <GreenCheese> } and do the same query, I get: | Rocks | | Dirt | | GreenCheese | Thus, if the defualt database *may* be contiminated, you need to fall back to the more verbose form of provenance constraint: SELECT ?stuff FROM <truth.rdf> FROM NAMED <lies.rdf> WHERE { GRAPH <truth.rdf> { <TheMoon> <isMadeOf> ?stuff } } -- -eric office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC, Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University, 5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520 JAPAN +1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA cell: +81.90.6533.3882 (eric@w3.org) Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than email address distribution.
Received on Thursday, 2 June 2005 11:35:28 UTC