- From: Eric Prud'hommeaux <eric@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 2 Jun 2005 07:35:22 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <20050602113522.GK1967@w3.org>
This is kind of like a test case for fromUnionQuery, hence the
threading choice.
Using Named Graphs (rq23) parlance, if I have a dataset:
default: { }
<lies.rdf>: { <TheMoon> <isMadeOf> <GreenCheese> }
<truth.rdf>: { <TheMoon> <isMadeOf> <Rocks>, <Dirt> }
and a query:
SELECT ?stuff
FROM <truth.rdf>
FROM NAMED <lies.rdf>
WHERE { <TheMoon> <isMadeOf> ?stuff }
I get pretty predictable results:
| Rocks |
| Dirt |
But the default graph need not start out empty. If i happen on a default
graph that alreay has <lies.rdf> in it:
default: { <TheMoon> <isMadeOf> <GreenCheese> }
and do the same query, I get:
| Rocks |
| Dirt |
| GreenCheese |
Thus, if the defualt database *may* be contiminated, you need to fall
back to the more verbose form of provenance constraint:
SELECT ?stuff
FROM <truth.rdf>
FROM NAMED <lies.rdf>
WHERE { GRAPH <truth.rdf> { <TheMoon> <isMadeOf> ?stuff } }
--
-eric
office: +81.466.49.1170 W3C, Keio Research Institute at SFC,
Shonan Fujisawa Campus, Keio University,
5322 Endo, Fujisawa, Kanagawa 252-8520
JAPAN
+1.617.258.5741 NE43-344, MIT, Cambridge, MA 02144 USA
cell: +81.90.6533.3882
(eric@w3.org)
Feel free to forward this message to any list for any purpose other than
email address distribution.
Received on Thursday, 2 June 2005 11:35:28 UTC