Re: more sorting test cases

Jeen Broekstra wrote:
> Jeen Broekstra wrote:
> 
>>
>>Seaborne, Andy wrote:
>>
>>[snip]
>>
>>
>>>Good - but I'm still unclear.  It is possible to have a test with one 
>>>of each kind in the results and get a defined ordering.
>>
>>
>>Yes. For example test case 3 does this: it contains a single unbound 
>>(and several ordered bound values) in the result.
>>
>>I'll include a few more, similar cases later, hopefully today.
>>
>>(By the way, the sorting test cases can be found at
>> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/sort/. Sorry for
>> forgetting the ref earlier).
> 
> 
> I've checked in a test case for sorting three values, all of which are 
> different terms: a bnode, a URI and a (typed) literal. Test sort-8 in 
> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/sort/manifest.ttl.

I have checked out the new test and my implementation can pass them.  The tests 
are a good coverage of the sorting proposal in rq23.

I propose the tests in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/tests/data/sort/ 
address the issue and should be adopted.

	Andy

<snip/>

Received on Tuesday, 3 May 2005 16:34:59 UTC