- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:50:04 -0500
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda
RDF Data Access Working Group
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/
Tuesday 2004-08-31 14:30 UTC
Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD")
http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343
Scribe: AlbertoR
supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg
log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/08/31-dawg-irc
roll call; cf http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who
and/or http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html
PROPOSED: to accept meeting record 2004-08-24 as ammended
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0371.html
next meeting 2004-09-07. Scribe?
Unless anyone has progress to report, let's
continue these without discussion:
ACTION: TomA: draft reply to Bjoerern Hoehrmann and send the
drafts to the WG mailing list.
ACTION: AndyS to show xmlopen slides to DAWG one or two days in advance.
ACTION Simon+Kendall elaborate the rel. of rules and "construct" in the UC&R
doc.
ACTION SimonR: write about the "returning bnodes from a query" issue.
CONTINUES.
ACTION: RobS to write response to Simon's union query. UC4.5
agenda ammendments?
2. ftf logistics
Any logistics/hosting issues?
http://jena.hpl.hp.com/~afs/F2F-Bristol.html
FYI, here's my itinerary and such...
http://www.w3.org/2004/09dc-brs/brs-itinb.txt
http://www.w3.org/2004/09dc-brs/brs-itin.n3
http://www.w3.org/2004/09dc-brs/
3. starting another BRQL spec walkthru
I'd like more issue owner volunteers. Let's start walking thru
the text of the spec.
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/
$Revision: 1.42 $ of $Date: 2004/08/27 16:25:08 $
4. Use Cases & Requirements publication
I gather this week is not the time, but let's double-check.
5. ftf agenda
As I mentioned last week, I think the goal of the meeting is
to get a Working Draft of the design released as a W3C Working Draft
shortly after the ftf.
Let's review our plans on these...
ACTION SimonR: write a document discussing tradeoffs with adapting
XQuery as an RDF query language for discussion thru the September
meeting in Bristol.
http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf2#xqfa
ACTION: JimH, to work with Bijan to do some sort of UDDI/Web services use
case.
Anything else in particular?
6. SOURCE, "provenance"/data-management
ACTION: DaveB to repropose source in both results and restrictions.
ACTION: AndyS to (try to) compose a test case on inferred triples
DONE: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0330.html
--
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 30 August 2004 15:49:28 UTC