- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 10:50:04 -0500
- To: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda RDF Data Access Working Group http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ Tuesday 2004-08-31 14:30 UTC Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD") http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343 Scribe: AlbertoR supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/08/31-dawg-irc roll call; cf http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who and/or http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html PROPOSED: to accept meeting record 2004-08-24 as ammended http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0371.html next meeting 2004-09-07. Scribe? Unless anyone has progress to report, let's continue these without discussion: ACTION: TomA: draft reply to Bjoerern Hoehrmann and send the drafts to the WG mailing list. ACTION: AndyS to show xmlopen slides to DAWG one or two days in advance. ACTION Simon+Kendall elaborate the rel. of rules and "construct" in the UC&R doc. ACTION SimonR: write about the "returning bnodes from a query" issue. CONTINUES. ACTION: RobS to write response to Simon's union query. UC4.5 agenda ammendments? 2. ftf logistics Any logistics/hosting issues? http://jena.hpl.hp.com/~afs/F2F-Bristol.html FYI, here's my itinerary and such... http://www.w3.org/2004/09dc-brs/brs-itinb.txt http://www.w3.org/2004/09dc-brs/brs-itin.n3 http://www.w3.org/2004/09dc-brs/ 3. starting another BRQL spec walkthru I'd like more issue owner volunteers. Let's start walking thru the text of the spec. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ $Revision: 1.42 $ of $Date: 2004/08/27 16:25:08 $ 4. Use Cases & Requirements publication I gather this week is not the time, but let's double-check. 5. ftf agenda As I mentioned last week, I think the goal of the meeting is to get a Working Draft of the design released as a W3C Working Draft shortly after the ftf. Let's review our plans on these... ACTION SimonR: write a document discussing tradeoffs with adapting XQuery as an RDF query language for discussion thru the September meeting in Bristol. http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf2#xqfa ACTION: JimH, to work with Bijan to do some sort of UDDI/Web services use case. Anything else in particular? 6. SOURCE, "provenance"/data-management ACTION: DaveB to repropose source in both results and restrictions. ACTION: AndyS to (try to) compose a test case on inferred triples DONE: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/0330.html -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Monday, 30 August 2004 15:49:28 UTC