- From: Tom Adams <tom@tucanatech.com>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 17:34:24 -0400
- To: DAWG public list <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
My regrets for tomorrow, don't think I can make it, yet another demo to be doing... Will try to have my action fulfilled before hand. Cheers, Tom On 30/08/2004, at 11:50 AM, Dan Connolly wrote: > > 1. Convene, take roll, review record, agenda > > RDF Data Access Working Group > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ > Tuesday 2004-08-31 14:30 UTC > Zakim Bridge +1.617.761.6200, conference 7333 ("RDFD") > http://www.w3.org/Guide/1998/08/teleconference-calendar#s_1343 > > Scribe: AlbertoR > supplementary chat: irc://irc.w3.org:6665/dawg > log to appear: http://www.w3.org/2004/08/31-dawg-irc > > roll call; cf http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/#who > and/or http://www.w3.org/1998/12/bridge/Zakim.html > > > PROPOSED: to accept meeting record 2004-08-24 as ammended > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/ > 0371.html > > next meeting 2004-09-07. Scribe? > > Unless anyone has progress to report, let's > continue these without discussion: > > ACTION: TomA: draft reply to Bjoerern Hoehrmann and send the > drafts to the WG mailing list. > > ACTION: AndyS to show xmlopen slides to DAWG one or two days in > advance. > > ACTION Simon+Kendall elaborate the rel. of rules and "construct" in > the UC&R > doc. > > ACTION SimonR: write about the "returning bnodes from a query" issue. > CONTINUES. > > ACTION: RobS to write response to Simon's union query. UC4.5 > > agenda ammendments? > > > 2. ftf logistics > > Any logistics/hosting issues? > http://jena.hpl.hp.com/~afs/F2F-Bristol.html > > FYI, here's my itinerary and such... > http://www.w3.org/2004/09dc-brs/brs-itinb.txt > http://www.w3.org/2004/09dc-brs/brs-itin.n3 > http://www.w3.org/2004/09dc-brs/ > > > 3. starting another BRQL spec walkthru > > I'd like more issue owner volunteers. Let's start walking thru > the text of the spec. > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/rq23/ > $Revision: 1.42 $ of $Date: 2004/08/27 16:25:08 $ > > > 4. Use Cases & Requirements publication > > I gather this week is not the time, but let's double-check. > > > 5. ftf agenda > > As I mentioned last week, I think the goal of the meeting is > to get a Working Draft of the design released as a W3C Working Draft > shortly after the ftf. > > Let's review our plans on these... > > ACTION SimonR: write a document discussing tradeoffs with adapting > XQuery as an RDF query language for discussion thru the September > meeting in Bristol. > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/DataAccess/ftf2#xqfa > > ACTION: JimH, to work with Bijan to do some sort of UDDI/Web services > use > case. > > Anything else in particular? > > > > 6. SOURCE, "provenance"/data-management > > ACTION: DaveB to repropose source in both results and restrictions. > > ACTION: AndyS to (try to) compose a test case on inferred triples > DONE: > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004JulSep/ > 0330.html > > > -- > Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/ > > > > -- Tom Adams | Tucana Technologies, Inc. Support Engineer | Office: +1 703 871 5312 tom@tucanatech.com | Cell: +1 571 594 0847 http://www.tucanatech.com | Fax: +1 877 290 6687 ------------------------------------------------------
Received on Monday, 30 August 2004 21:34:27 UTC