- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 11:20:38 -0500
- To: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 10:44, Kendall Clark wrote: > On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 10:34:41AM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > > On Fri, 2004-08-27 at 10:15, Kendall Clark wrote: > > [...] > > > Is this outside our brief? > > > > yes: > > http://www.w3.org/2003/12/swa/dawg-charter#update > > I disagree. The plain meaning of 2.4 is that we aren't *required* to > do update; It's under "out of scope" which says more than that, to me. > that's not the same as update being illicit or illegal or a > violation of the charter. > > At the very least, I think we should have a conversation about these > issues in order to "expend reasonable effort to ensure that such > extension is easy". I'm not inclined to give high priority just now... not until we've settled some basics, like the definition of "Graph match". > Heh, in fact, "the group may include such an ability", so, in fact, > it's *not* outside the charter. ugh. who wrote that thing, anyway? 1/2 ;-) > > Kendall -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 27 August 2004 16:20:09 UTC