- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 15:18:05 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Fri, Aug 27, 2004 at 11:20:38AM -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > I'm not inclined to give high priority just now... not > until we've settled some basics, like the definition of "Graph match". Yes, but that's v. different than "we can't do this". > > Heh, in fact, "the group may include such an ability", so, in fact, > > it's *not* outside the charter. > > ugh. who wrote that thing, anyway? 1/2 ;-) I'm assuming the chair has no special interpretive authorities, right? :> The charter plainly says we can do update, and it also seems to require us to at least *talk* about it, which we haven't done. I offer no thoughts as to relative priority. Graph match is clearly more crucial. Kendall
Received on Friday, 27 August 2004 19:19:57 UTC