- From: Thompson, Bryan B. <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>
- Date: Fri, 2 Jul 2004 15:17:31 -0400
- To: 'Dan Connolly ' <connolly@w3.org>, "'Thompson, Bryan B. '" <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>
- Cc: 'RDF Data Access Working Group ' <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>, "'graham.moore@empolis.net'" <graham.moore@empolis.net>
Dan, I saw Graham Moore present on a SOAP binding last year at XML. I've Cc'd him. I also know that he is working on SNAPI (Semantic Net API), which is similar to the RDF Net API. Graham - are there detailed specifications for a SOAP binding? -bryan -----Original Message----- From: Dan Connolly To: Thompson, Bryan B. Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group Sent: 7/2/2004 2:27 PM Subject: RE: which RDF data access designs do you support? WBS questionnai re On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 05:44, Thompson, Bryan B. wrote: > Dan, > > I actually support my own protocol proposal, which is the XPointer > approach using the HTTP Range header for subresource addressing. I'd > appreciate some space in which people could vote on this in relation > to other protocol proposals. Ah yes; quite. I was mostly working on designs that had been evaluated, but we've had very little evaluation of protocol designs. I added it to the protocol question. http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/initdn/ Please update your answer, Brian (and others, if you like). > I also think that it is important to give > people options for some other proposals (e.g., SOAP binding of RDFNet > API, I don't recall seeing a design like that. Got a pointer handy? > etc.) pointers? > -bryan -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 2 July 2004 15:17:41 UTC