- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 02 Jul 2004 13:27:21 -0500
- To: "Thompson, Bryan B." <BRYAN.B.THOMPSON@saic.com>
- Cc: RDF Data Access Working Group <public-rdf-dawg@w3.org>
On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 05:44, Thompson, Bryan B. wrote: > Dan, > > I actually support my own protocol proposal, which is the XPointer > approach using the HTTP Range header for subresource addressing. I'd > appreciate some space in which people could vote on this in relation > to other protocol proposals. Ah yes; quite. I was mostly working on designs that had been evaluated, but we've had very little evaluation of protocol designs. I added it to the protocol question. http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/initdn/ Please update your answer, Brian (and others, if you like). > I also think that it is important to give > people options for some other proposals (e.g., SOAP binding of RDFNet > API, I don't recall seeing a design like that. Got a pointer handy? > etc.) pointers? > -bryan -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 2 July 2004 14:27:21 UTC