RE: which RDF data access designs do you support? WBS questionnaire

http://www.w3.org/Submission/2003/SUBM-rdf-netapi-20031002/

has a link to Graham's work : http://www.semanticwebserver.org/home.html

Not sure the state of the site: it appears not to be up at the moment and
I can't find a copy of it. 

	Andy


-------- Original Message --------
> From: Dan Connolly <>
> Date: Thompson, Bryan B.
> 
> On Fri, 2004-07-02 at 05:44, Thompson, Bryan B. wrote:
> > Dan,
> > 
> > I actually support my own protocol proposal, which is the XPointer
> > approach using the HTTP Range header for subresource addressing.  I'd
> > appreciate some space in which people could vote on this in relation
> > to other protocol proposals.
> 
> Ah yes; quite. I was mostly working on designs that had been
> evaluated, but we've had very little evaluation of protocol designs.
> 
> I added it to the protocol question.
>   http://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/35463/initdn/
> 
> Please update your answer, Brian (and others, if you like).
> 
> >   I also think that it is important to give
> > people options for some other proposals (e.g., SOAP binding of RDFNet
> > API,
> 
> I don't recall seeing a design like that. Got a pointer handy?
> 
> >  etc.)
> 
> pointers?
> 
> > -bryan
-------- Original Message --------
> From: public-rdf-dawg-request@w3.org <>
> Date:
> 
> Dan,
> 
> I saw Graham Moore present on a SOAP binding last year at
> XML.  I've Cc'd him.  I also know that he is working on SNAPI
> (Semantic Net API), which is similar to the RDF Net API.
> 
> Graham - are there detailed specifications for a SOAP binding?
> 
> -bryan

Received on Friday, 2 July 2004 15:33:38 UTC