- From: Steve Harris <S.W.Harris@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 14:15:14 +0100
- To: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 01:48:27 +0100, Andy Seaborne wrote: > Could we add, for the record, this test case illustrates the ambiguity due > to order of evaulation with multiple optional triples: theer is no nesting > of optionals > > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-rdf-dawg/2004AprJun/0652.html > > We need to cover the issue sometime if we adopt 3.6. Sorry, I meant to mail to ask if you wanted this included - I agreed to try to freeze the document by Friday the 25th IIRC, but I'm happy to add this is people are OK with it. - Steve
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2004 09:15:17 UTC