- From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:17:44 -0400
- To: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
- Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 07:03:24AM -0400, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote: > [[ > 4.5 Aggregate Query > > It should be possible to specify two or more RDF graphs against which > a query shall be executed; that is, the result of an aggregate query > is the merge of the results of executing the query on each of two or > more graphs. > ]] > > This states that we perform the query on each of the (two or more) > graphs. My intuition is that we want to perform the query on the > aggregation of the graphs. For instance, > Maybe this was already decided in favor of the former; I don't recall. We discussed this originally, as I recall. Aggregate, then query is distinct from query separately, aggregate results. I called what you're proposing "union query". Again, as I recall the discussion, there was more support for aggregate query than union query. Alas, I'm too lazy just now to hunt in the archives to confirm my memory. Kendall Clark
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2004 09:15:03 UTC