W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-rdf-dawg@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re: Ambiguity and 4.5 Aggregate Query (and screw case)

From: Kendall Clark <kendall@monkeyfist.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 08:17:44 -0400
To: "Eric Prud'hommeaux" <eric@w3.org>
Cc: public-rdf-dawg@w3.org
Message-ID: <20040629121744.GA31384@monkeyfist.com>

On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 07:03:24AM -0400, Eric Prud'hommeaux wrote:
> [[
> 4.5 Aggregate Query
> It should be possible to specify two or more RDF graphs against which
> a query shall be executed; that is, the result of an aggregate query
> is the merge of the results of executing the query on each of two or
> more graphs.
> ]]
> This states that we perform the query on each of the (two or more)
> graphs. My intuition is that we want to perform the query on the
> aggregation of the graphs. For instance,

> Maybe this was already decided in favor of the former; I don't recall.

We discussed this originally, as I recall. Aggregate, then query is
distinct from query separately, aggregate results. I called what
you're proposing "union query". Again, as I recall the discussion,
there was more support for aggregate query than union query.

Alas, I'm too lazy just now to hunt in the archives to confirm my

Kendall Clark
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2004 09:15:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 17:00:27 UTC